http://www.thestar.com.my/Sport/Badminton/2013/09/23/BAM-revert-to-original-plan-with-launch-of-new-project.aspx
Looks more and more like an Umno style Sandiwara
or stage show to hide the ultimate agenda of cutting costs.
With leaders working for free but trying to bring in modern
technology and hopefully sports science to bring badminton
on par with the rest of the world.
Cutting red tape and unproductive layers of management
but still maintaining under educated coaches schooled in the
traditional mould but finally putting annoying administrators
where they rightfully belong, providing support services.
But still under the thumb of the NSC and devoid now of the
politicians cum horse traders to demand financial allocations
to share all round as in "lu tolong gua gua tolong lu".
Will this motivate the players in this day and age,that is
,leadership by example and discipline, whilst the Gen Y players
have to struggle with meagre allowances whilst their peers
graduate from Universities and start to plunge into lifelong debt
driving expensive cars and supporting trophy girlfriends and
trying to strike it as a millionaire before they reach 30,
encouraged by the generous (with other peoples' money ,
that is ) government of the day?
Take a step backwards and look at the big picture, in
recent times pockets of success were the result of technological
change that Fang Kai Xiang brought in 1987, 88 to 92 were the
efforts of a certain Santa who splurged other peoples' money to
buy talent like an oil rich sheikh during the Asian miracle and
success was brought in by Foreigners like Frost and Indra
Gunawan later.
After that during the age of the easy credit economy , all limited
resources were concentrated on one singles player and one
doubles pair to show some results to justify allocation of funds.
The rest of the limited resources were probably spent on non-
players who unlike players did not have to produce viable results.
Looks more and more like an Umno style Sandiwara
or stage show to hide the ultimate agenda of cutting costs.
With leaders working for free but trying to bring in modern
technology and hopefully sports science to bring badminton
on par with the rest of the world.
Cutting red tape and unproductive layers of management
but still maintaining under educated coaches schooled in the
traditional mould but finally putting annoying administrators
where they rightfully belong, providing support services.
But still under the thumb of the NSC and devoid now of the
politicians cum horse traders to demand financial allocations
to share all round as in "lu tolong gua gua tolong lu".
Will this motivate the players in this day and age,that is
,leadership by example and discipline, whilst the Gen Y players
have to struggle with meagre allowances whilst their peers
graduate from Universities and start to plunge into lifelong debt
driving expensive cars and supporting trophy girlfriends and
trying to strike it as a millionaire before they reach 30,
encouraged by the generous (with other peoples' money ,
that is ) government of the day?
Take a step backwards and look at the big picture, in
recent times pockets of success were the result of technological
change that Fang Kai Xiang brought in 1987, 88 to 92 were the
efforts of a certain Santa who splurged other peoples' money to
buy talent like an oil rich sheikh during the Asian miracle and
success was brought in by Foreigners like Frost and Indra
Gunawan later.
After that during the age of the easy credit economy , all limited
resources were concentrated on one singles player and one
doubles pair to show some results to justify allocation of funds.
The rest of the limited resources were probably spent on non-
players who unlike players did not have to produce viable results.
so after 2 weeks everything reverts to square one
ReplyDeleteand Tan Aik Mong quits and Rashid considers returning.