http://www.nst.com.my/sports/badminton/hoyer-larsen-wants-bwf-top-post-1.207878
Poul Erik has been greatly admired as a player.I wonder
what it would be like if he became President with Thomas
Lund as secretary,then Europeans will dominate the sport
and try to impose the traditional "genteel" and part-time player
mind-set to the sport to the detriment of the pros in say China,
then the sport will be plagued by a run of injuries to players
careers and the Olympic fiasco will be repeated for the sake
of "sportsmanship" against the professional players' will.
Probably any European or Indonesian will simply continue the
policies of the past president and focus on more "sportsmanship"
and devastating schedules to the detriment of badminton as a
pro sport where players can earn a decent living.
On the other hand there is a slight advantage in that badminton
would not degenerate into the type of scandals plaguing soccer
which is controlled by bookies and betting syndicates which has
completely destroyed football in China and is threatening world
football.
China as the leading nation should take heed of the imminent danger
of badminton sinking as low as football the other Olympic sport with
its match-fixing and cynical "professionalism",which will destroy
Badminton's image ,not only as an Olympic sport but also as a
professional sport.
More amateurism ,"sportsmanship" and "Olympic Spirit" or more
professionalism,commercialisation (and with it the threat of corruption),
we shall see after the new President takes the chair.
I dont know about others but I will definitely not turn back the clock
against something built up so hard over decades for the sake of some
kind of fancy ideal.
So where will badminton be heading, hopefully more like Tennis or Table
Tennis,and hopefully not like the badminton of old or like Squash today,
trying to join the ranks of Badminton,Tennis and Table Tennis.
To China's credit,although she dominates the sport, she has never
attempted to take over the BWF.
When comparing Tennis with Badminton many conveniently forget that
Tennis is very commercial with the emphasis on winning Grand Slams
with big bucks,players take the Davis Cup or Olympics with reservations,
and fans dont try to bad-mouth them for that.
In badminton many countries focus on the non-revenue tournamnents like
Thomas/Uber Cups,Sudirman Cup,Olympics and the World Championships
as has been the case for decades, and the Super Series are mainly fillers.
http://thestar.com.my/sports/story.asp?file=/2013/2/20/sports/12733265
Poul Erik has been greatly admired as a player.I wonder
what it would be like if he became President with Thomas
Lund as secretary,then Europeans will dominate the sport
and try to impose the traditional "genteel" and part-time player
mind-set to the sport to the detriment of the pros in say China,
then the sport will be plagued by a run of injuries to players
careers and the Olympic fiasco will be repeated for the sake
of "sportsmanship" against the professional players' will.
Probably any European or Indonesian will simply continue the
policies of the past president and focus on more "sportsmanship"
and devastating schedules to the detriment of badminton as a
pro sport where players can earn a decent living.
On the other hand there is a slight advantage in that badminton
would not degenerate into the type of scandals plaguing soccer
which is controlled by bookies and betting syndicates which has
completely destroyed football in China and is threatening world
football.
China as the leading nation should take heed of the imminent danger
of badminton sinking as low as football the other Olympic sport with
its match-fixing and cynical "professionalism",which will destroy
Badminton's image ,not only as an Olympic sport but also as a
professional sport.
More amateurism ,"sportsmanship" and "Olympic Spirit" or more
professionalism,commercialisation (and with it the threat of corruption),
we shall see after the new President takes the chair.
I dont know about others but I will definitely not turn back the clock
against something built up so hard over decades for the sake of some
kind of fancy ideal.
So where will badminton be heading, hopefully more like Tennis or Table
Tennis,and hopefully not like the badminton of old or like Squash today,
trying to join the ranks of Badminton,Tennis and Table Tennis.
To China's credit,although she dominates the sport, she has never
attempted to take over the BWF.
When comparing Tennis with Badminton many conveniently forget that
Tennis is very commercial with the emphasis on winning Grand Slams
with big bucks,players take the Davis Cup or Olympics with reservations,
and fans dont try to bad-mouth them for that.
In badminton many countries focus on the non-revenue tournamnents like
Thomas/Uber Cups,Sudirman Cup,Olympics and the World Championships
as has been the case for decades, and the Super Series are mainly fillers.
http://thestar.com.my/sports/story.asp?file=/2013/2/20/sports/12733265
No comments:
Post a Comment